[slinkelist] mpeg2 ????????

[George Tang]

Oh my gosh... I still remember the Tandy TRS-80's... I used to have a Model
II...

George

-----Original Message-----
From: slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com]On
Behalf Of John W. Schaaf
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2000 12:05 PM
To: slinkelist@nirvis.com
Subject: Re:RE: [slinkelist] mpeg2 ???????? 


Possible uses that come to mind for the old 486 are large paper weight or a
door
stop. :-)

Sorry, I couldn't help it.  Please don't flame me.  I like old computers.  I
have a collection of TRS-80's.  Tell me how I can use them for CDJ.  No that
is
a challenge.

John.

____________________Reply Separator____________________
Subject:    RE: [slinkelist] mpeg2 ???????? 
Author: George Tang <GeorgeT@concur.com>
Date:       3/15/00 11:39 AM

Well, I've also found that MP3 requires sooo much CPU processing during
playback.  On my 486/100, there's no way I can play MP3 because the CPU is
just not fast enough to handle it. Unfortunately, that's the machine that I
have CDJ running and Slinke hooked up to.

In a few more month I'll get another faster machine to replace the 486, and
have the 486 just be a file server, which is stupid since hard drives are so
cheap now-a-days. Anyone else can think of what I can use the 486 for on the
network???

George

-----Original Message-----
From: slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com]On
Behalf Of Marty Culbert
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2000 11:19 AM
To: SLink List
Subject: Re: [slinkelist] mpeg2 ????????


Correct. AAC is a completely different - and superior - encoding method than
MP3. They are just as incompatible as .wav and MP3 files are - they require
a different decoder. An app like Winamp could easily play AAC files if
someone writes a decoder plug-in... Or, CDJ could support AAC, or any other
audio format, if CDJ could also use Windows MMC decoders (this idea is fret
with all sorts of support problems. so I'm not requesting this feature)

On the issue of MP3's and CDs sound quality comparisons: MP3 recordings vary
greatly from CD sound quality partly because your CD player most likely has
much better DACs (digital to analog converters) than your PC soundcard....

-Marty

----- Original Message -----
From: Elron A. Yellin <elron@motu.com>
To: <slinkelist@nirvis.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2000 8:21 AM
Subject: Re: [slinkelist] mpeg2 ????????


> It is my impression that the latest revision of mpeg-2 audio (AAC) has
> surpassed mpeg audio layer 3 (aka mpeg3) in performance, but in a
> non-backward-compatible way.  I could be wrong about this.
>
> Elron
> > I'm bit confused, isn't mp3 = mpeg3 - Audio Layer Only
> >
> > As in progressive :
> > mpeg1 -> mpeg2 -> mpeg3 (the video compression of 3 is (as far as I
> > know) not yet developed, so Mpeg3_Audio_only = mp3)
> >
> > mpeg3 is improved version of mpeg2, right or wrong?
> > Or is it that improved compression of mpeg3 produses poorer audio
> > quality than mpeg2.
> >
> > -michael (A)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> slinkelist maillist  -  slinkelist@nirvis.com
> http://www.nirvis.com/mailman/listinfo/slinkelist



_______________________________________________
slinkelist maillist  -  slinkelist@nirvis.com
http://www.nirvis.com/mailman/listinfo/slinkelist


_______________________________________________
slinkelist maillist  -  slinkelist@nirvis.com
http://www.nirvis.com/mailman/listinfo/slinkelist




_______________________________________________
slinkelist maillist  -  slinkelist@nirvis.com
http://www.nirvis.com/mailman/listinfo/slinkelist