[slinkelist] Does the new version of CDJ have a different db format?

[Rick Engle]

So the same schema overall then, no more new fields?

Thanks,
  Rick

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Colby Boles [mailto:cboles@nirvis.com] 
Sent:	Friday, March 31, 2000 8:15 PM
To:	Rick Engle; slinkelist@nirvis.com
Subject:	RE: [slinkelist] Does the new version of CDJ have a
different db format?

The CDJID field now holds a larger, more unique, hex number than the old
CDDB ID which used to be there. The DB now uses the LocationValid flag to
indicate that a disc is no longer found in the changer instead of setting
player and slot to -1.

That's about it.

Colby

> -----Original Message-----
> From: slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com]On
> Behalf Of Rick Engle
> Sent: Friday, March 31, 2000 4:50 PM
> To: slinkelist@nirvis.com
> Subject: [slinkelist] Does the new version of CDJ have a different db
> format?
>
>
> I wrote some code to grab info out of the user.mdb file and
> wanted to see if
> any changes had been made to the db with the new version.
>
> Thanks,
>    Rick
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> slinkelist maillist  -  slinkelist@nirvis.com
> http://www.nirvis.com/mailman/listinfo/slinkelist
>
>