[slinkelist] Does the new version of CDJ have a different db format?

[Colby Boles]

right.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick Engle [mailto:ricke@MICROSOFT.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 31, 2000 5:19 PM
> To: Colby Boles; slinkelist@nirvis.com
> Subject: RE: [slinkelist] Does the new version of CDJ have a different
> db format?
>
>
> So the same schema overall then, no more new fields?
>
> Thanks,
>   Rick
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Colby Boles [mailto:cboles@nirvis.com]
> Sent:	Friday, March 31, 2000 8:15 PM
> To:	Rick Engle; slinkelist@nirvis.com
> Subject:	RE: [slinkelist] Does the new version of CDJ have a
> different db format?
>
> The CDJID field now holds a larger, more unique, hex number than the old
> CDDB ID which used to be there. The DB now uses the LocationValid flag to
> indicate that a disc is no longer found in the changer instead of setting
> player and slot to -1.
>
> That's about it.
>
> Colby
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com]On
> > Behalf Of Rick Engle
> > Sent: Friday, March 31, 2000 4:50 PM
> > To: slinkelist@nirvis.com
> > Subject: [slinkelist] Does the new version of CDJ have a different db
> > format?
> >
> >
> > I wrote some code to grab info out of the user.mdb file and
> > wanted to see if
> > any changes had been made to the db with the new version.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >    Rick
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > slinkelist maillist  -  slinkelist@nirvis.com
> > http://www.nirvis.com/mailman/listinfo/slinkelist
> >
> >
>
>